
On-prem, Azure or multi-cloud: the resource locations where they pay — the workspace as architecture, not as dogma.
The question isn't 'cloud yes or no' but 'where does each workload pay': the ERP close to its database (on-prem), the seasonal peaks on Azure (autoscale), the DR in the other region, the developers where GPU is needed. With DaaS the resource locations are bricks: the hybrid architecture is composed by criteria, not by fashion.


Apps, data and latencies mapped: the 'where runs what' sheet before any migration.
Cloud VDI pays IF it autoscales: the calculation on real hourly profiles, not on price lists.
Golden images and FSLogix consistent across locations: the user migrates without noticing.
The reserve location tested: the workplace too has its failover.
Citrix's strength is neutrality: the same apps published from on-prem, Azure (even AVD/Windows 365 underneath), AWS and GCP, with the user not knowing nor needing to know where the session runs; the DaaS control plane orchestrates the resource locations, the image is built once (with IaC tools), Autoscale governs the cloud costs, the burst covers the peaks (seasonal, M&A, DR); the typical strategy: the amortized on-prem baseload, the elasticity in the cloud.
The journey in stages, without leaps into the void.
Retail and seasons: the desktops that follow the peaks.
The workspace that survives the site.